Microsoft sues U.S. government over data requests



Microsoft Corp has sued the U.S. government for the right to tell its customers when a federal agency is looking at their emails, the latest in a series of clashes over privacy between the technology industry and Washington.

The lawsuit, filed on Wednesday in federal court in the Western District of Washington, argues that the government is violating the U.S. Constitution by preventing Microsoft from notifying thousands of customers about government requests for their emails and other documents.

The U.S. Department of Justice did not immediately respond to a request to comment.

The government’s actions contravene the Fourth Amendment, which establishes the right for people and businesses to know if the government searches or seizes their property, the suit argues, and the First Amendment right to free speech.

Microsoft’s suit focuses on the storage of data on remote servers, rather than locally on people’s computers, which Microsoft says has provided a new opening for the government to access electronic data.

Using the Electronic Communications Privacy Act, the government is increasingly directing investigations at the parties that store data in the so-called cloud, Microsoft says. The 30-year-old law has long drawn scrutiny from technology companies and privacy advocates who say it was written before the rise of the commercial Internet and is therefore outdated.

“People do not give up their rights when they move their private information from physical storage to the cloud,” Microsoft says in the lawsuit, a copy of which was seen by Reuters. It adds that the government “has exploited the transition to cloud computing as a means of expanding its power to conduct secret investigations.”

The lawsuit represents the newest front in the battle between technology companies and the U.S. government over how much private businesses should assist government surveillance.

By filing the suit, Microsoft is taking a more prominent role in that battle, dominated by Apple Inc in recent months due to the government’s efforts to get the company to write software to unlock an iPhone used by one of the shooters in a December massacre in San Bernardino, California. Apple, backed by big technology companies including Microsoft, had complained that cooperating would turn businesses into arms of the state.

In its complaint, Microsoft says over the past 18 months it has received 5,624 legal orders under the ECPA, of which 2,576 prevented Microsoft from disclosing that the government is seeking customer data through warrants, subpoenas and other requests. Most of the ECPA requests apply to individuals, not companies, and provide no fixed end date to the secrecy provision, Microsoft said.

Microsoft and other companies won the right two years ago to disclose the number of government demands for data they receive. This case goes farther, requesting that it be allowed to notify individual businesses and people that the government is seeking information about them.

Increasingly, U.S. companies are under pressure to prove they are helping protect consumer privacy. The campaign gained momentum in the wake of revelations by former government contractor Edward Snowden in 2013 that the government routinely conducted extensive phone and Internet surveillance to a much greater degree than believed.

Microsoft’s lawsuit comes a day after a U.S. congressional panel voted unanimously to advance a package of reforms to the ECPA.

Last-minute changes to the legislation removed an obligation for the government to notify a targeted user whose communications are being sought. Instead, the bill would require disclosure of a warrant only to a service provider, which retains the right to voluntarily notify users, unless a court grants a gag order.

Republican leadership said it will bring the bill to a full vote in the House of Representatives in two weeks. After its expected passage, the bill will await Senate consideration.

Separately, Microsoft is fighting a U.S. government warrant to turn over data held in a server in Ireland, which the government argues is lawful under another part of the ECPA. Microsoft argues the government needs to go through a procedure outlined in a legal assistance treaty between the U.S. and Ireland.

Also on The Globe and Mail



Apple could push FBI to reveal iPhone hack tactics
(Reuters)

Courtesy: The Globe And Mail

10 thoughts on “Microsoft sues U.S. government over data requests

  • May 13, 2016 at 12:43 am
    Permalink

    Digital industries: supporting the mob and criminals everywhere.

    Reply
  • May 14, 2016 at 3:23 am
    Permalink

    Perhaps the US Government should focus on the secrecy surrounding Microsoft’s off-shore money laundering / tax evasion. It seems that Microsoft and others (Apple, Google etc.) are highly selective as to what should be kept secret in protecting the public interest.

    Reply
  • May 15, 2016 at 3:28 am
    Permalink

    Censorship, in its old-fashioned meaning, is a government edict that forbids the discussion of some specific subjects or ideas—such, for instance, as sex, religion or criticism of government officials—an edict enforced by the government’s scrutiny of all forms of communication prior to their public release.

    But for stifling the freedom of men’s minds the modern method is much more potent; it rests on the power of nonobjective law; it neither forbids nor permits anything; it never defines or specifies; it merely delivers men’s lives, fortunes, careers, ambitions into the arbitrary power of a bureaucrat who can reward or punish at whim. It spares the bureaucrat the troublesome necessity of committing himself to rigid rules—and it places upon the victims the burden of discovering how to please him, with a fluid unknowable as their only guide.

    Reply
  • May 16, 2016 at 12:02 am
    Permalink

    The US government and its partners are going after the Chinese model. Censorship and police state mentality.
    US “justice” system is atrocious, largest prison state in the world by far.

    Reply
  • May 16, 2016 at 7:15 pm
    Permalink

    Ironic that many Americans who are vocal about their 1st Amendment right to bare arms are absolutely silent when it comes to their right to privacy.

    Reply
  • May 17, 2016 at 10:17 pm
    Permalink

    It depends on what remedy or damages that Microsoft Corp is seeking.

    It sounds like they’re looking for an injunction to stop the US Government from accessing their commercial information and clients’ information.

    The fourth amendment, restraint of trade, may provide an answer.

    Perhaps the 1986 statute (mentioned in the article) will withstand constitutional scrutiny.

    The litigation will nevertheless be costly.

    Reply
  • May 18, 2016 at 6:36 am
    Permalink

    The US gov,t have been playing footloose with the constitution for some time now. Nice to see them get called on it ……

    Reply
  • May 18, 2016 at 1:16 pm
    Permalink

    George Orwell’s ‘1984’ succinctly summarizes big brother watching over every sentence that someone writes, every word that someone says, and every step that someone takes. This lawsuit doesn’t surprise me, however, what does, is whether this and a lot of other things would’ve happened if Mr. Snowden did not do what he did. And he’s still being actively investigated by the US. What a shame!

    Reply
  • May 18, 2016 at 4:01 pm
    Permalink

    joe_six-be very weary of trusting a government which continues to hunt down a whistleblower who fortunately for humanity exposed the nefarious law breaking, snooping and warrantless intrusion activites of american government agencies under the guise of ‘national security’.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *